Product Description (Men's Kenneth Cole Reaction Prospect Park Reversible Belt)
A thick, streamlined belt with sharp angles and a modern, elongated buckle that twists to convert the belt from brown to black and back again.
1.5-inch wide with The REACTION logo embossed on buckle.
Customer Reviews of Kenneth Cole Reaction Prospect Park Reversible Belt
(# of Reviews: 4)
Write an online review
Overall Customer Rating:
Awesome belt
March 02, 2008
Reviewer: Mark from Sydney, Australia
Great reversible belt with stylish wide rectangular buckle made of brushed metal
Awesome!
May 22, 2007
Reviewer: Stevie b. from FL
The color of this belt matched the picture online. The size was perfect and I loved the style. I will definantly buy it again!
Great belt, but buckle is way too big for dress pants (in my opinion).
January 31, 2007
Reviewer: MarkG from Scarsdale, NY
Ordered this belt from Shoebuy.com at a price I couldn't match anywhere! Received belt in the mail and it is very beautiful, with nice smooth leather and an attractive looking buckle. However, this belt just doesn't look right on dress pants in my opinion, as this is what I bought it for (I tried it with a pair of dress pants and the buckle is way too big). For casual pants or jeans, I think the buckle size would work fine. Again, this is just my own opinion. Perhaps it will work out better for you. It's a terrific belt that just didn't serve my purpose.
Great service and price
January 18, 2007
Reviewer: Albert from Orange County, CA
Better deals on here than anywhere, period!
Kenneth Cole Reaction Prospect Park Reversible Belt
Brand:
Kenneth Cole Reaction
Style:
Prospect Park Reversible Belt
• To view all Kenneth Cole Reaction Styles,
click here
• To email a friend about the Prospect Park Reversible Belt,
click here
• To be notified when the Prospect Park Reversible Belt is available in your size,
click here
• To be notified when new Kenneth Cole Reaction styles are added,
click here
Awesome!
May 22, 2007
Great belt, but buckle is way too big for dress pants (in my opinion).
January 31, 2007